Randomised controlled trial of mesalazine in IBS.

Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Centre for Applied Biomedical Research, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Division of Gastroenterology SOD2, University Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, Ospedale Maggiore, Policlinico, Milan, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. Division of Gastroenterology, Casa Sollievo Sofferenza Hospital, IRCCS, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit of Comacchio/Lagosanto, Ferrara, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, University Campus Bio-Medico of Rome, Rome, Italy. Digestive Motility Diseases, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, S. Martino Hospital, Belluno, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Clinical Science, "L. Sacco" University Hospital, Milan, Italy. Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences and CESI, G. D'Annunzio University and Foundation, Chieti, Italy. Gastroenterology Unit, St. Andrea Hospital, Vercelli, Italy. Department of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology and Clinical Nutrition, Dell'Angelo Hospital, Venice, Italy. Division of Gastroenterology, AO San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy. Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy. Santissima Annunziata Hospital, Cento, Italy.

Gut. 2016;(1):82-90

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Low-grade intestinal inflammation plays a role in the pathophysiology of IBS. In this trial, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy and safety of mesalazine in patients with IBS. DESIGN We conducted a phase 3, multicentre, tertiary setting, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with Rome III confirmed IBS. Patients were randomly assigned to either mesalazine, 800 mg, or placebo, three times daily for 12 weeks, and were followed for additional 12 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was satisfactory relief of abdominal pain/discomfort for at least half of the weeks of the treatment period. The key secondary endpoint was satisfactory relief of overall IBS symptoms. Supportive analyses were also performed classifying as responders patients with a percentage of affirmative answers of at least 75% or >75% of time. RESULTS A total of 185 patients with IBS were enrolled from 21 centres. For the primary endpoint, the responder patients were 68.6% in the mesalazine group versus 67.4% in the placebo group (p=0.870; 95% CI -12.8 to 15.1). In explorative analyses, with the 75% rule or >75% rule, the percentage of responders was greater in the mesalazine group with a difference over placebo of 11.6% (p=0.115; 95% CI -2.7% to 26.0%) and 5.9% (p=0.404; 95% CI -7.8% to 19.4%), respectively, although these differences were not significant. For the key secondary endpoint, overall symptoms improved in the mesalazine group and reached a significant difference of 15.1% versus placebo (p=0.032; 95% CI 1.5% to 28.7%) with the >75% rule. CONCLUSIONS Mesalazine treatment was not superior than placebo on the study primary endpoint. However, a subgroup of patients with IBS showed a sustained therapy response and benefits from a mesalazine therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT00626288.

Methodological quality

Metadata